Chinese born global firms and international entrepreneurial mechanism

Authors

  • Junjie Zhang Xuri Business School, Donghua University, 200051, Shanghai, China
  • Rongyao Cheng Xuri Business School, Donghua University, 200051, Shanghai, China
  • Weibin Wang Business School, Jiaxing University, Jiaxing 314001, China

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18533/jefs.v4i05.254

Keywords:

born global firms, overseas market opportunity recognition, organization learning

Abstract

This paper explores Chinese-born global firms’ entrepreneurial mechanism and development mode from multi-theoretical perspectives using company case studies. The findings suggest that for Chinese born global firms, overseas market opportunity’s recognition and exploitation is the starting point and catalyst for their establishment and growth, while global resources integration is growing mode for their continuous development. Results suggest that overseas market knowledge and organization learning are the bases for Chinese born global firms to cultivate and maintain sustainable competitive advantages after they have entered international markets.

The paper explores Chinese-born global firms’ entrepreneurial mechanism and development mode from multi-theoretical perspectives using company case studies from China. The findings suggest that for Chinese born global firms, overseas market opportunity’s recognition and exploitation is the starting point and catalyst for their establishment and growth, while global resources integration is growing mode for their continuous development. Results suggest that overseas market knowledge and organization learning are the bases for Chinese born global firms to cultivate and maintain sustainable competitive advantages after they have entered international markets.

 

References

Andersson S, Wictor I. (2003). Innovative internationalization in new firms: Born globals—The Swedish case. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 1 (3), 249—276. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/A:1024110806241

Autio E. (2005). Creative tension: The significance of Ben Oviatt and Patricia McDougalls article“toward a theory of international new ventures”. Journal of International Business Studies, 36(1), 9—19.

Autio E, Sapienza H J, Almeida J G. (2000). Effects of age at entry, knowledge intensity, and imitability on international growth. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 909—924. http://www.jstor.org/stable/1556419

Dimitratosa P, Jonesh M V. (2005). Future directions for international entrepreneurship research. International Business Review, 14 (2), 119—128.

Eisenhardt K. (1989). Building theories from case study research. Academy of Management Review, 14 (4), 532—550. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/AMR.1989.4308385

Gabrielsson, M. and Pelkonen, T. (2008). Born internationals: Market expansion and business operation mode strategies in the digital media field. Journal of International Entrepreneurship, 6(2), 49-71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10843-008-0020-z

Harveston P D, Kedia B L, Davis P S. (2000). Internationalization of born global and gradual globalizing firms: The impact of the manager. Advances in Competitiveness Research, 8 (1), 92—99.

Johanson, J., & Vahlne, J.-E. (1977). the internationalization process of the firm: A model of knowledge development and increasing foreign market commitments. Journal of International Business Studies, 8(1), 23–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490676

Knight G A, Cavusgil S T. (2004). Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born global firm. Journal of International Business Studies, (35), 124—141. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8400071

Knight G G, Cavusgil S T. (1996). The born global firm: A challenge to traditional internationalization theory. Advances in International Marketing, 8 (1), 11—26.

Kuemmerle W. (1997). Building effective R&D capabilities abroad. Harvard Business Review, 75 (Mar/Apr), 61—70.

Madsen T K, Servais P., (1997). The internationalization of born globals: An evolutionary process? International Business Review, 6 (6), 561—583. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0969-593(97)00032-2

McDougall P P, Oviatt B M. (2000). International entrepreneurship: The intersection of two research paths. Academy of Management Journal, 43(5), 902—908. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1556418

Oviatt B M, McDougall P P. (1994). Toward a theory of international new ventures. Journal of International Business Studies, 25 (1), 45—64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/palgrave.jibs.8490193

Oviatt B M, McDougall P P. (1995). Global start-ups: Entrepreneurs on a worldwide stage. Academy of Management Executive, 9 (2), 30—44. http://www.jstor.org/stable/4165256

Stevenson H H, Jarillo C J., (1990). A paradigm of entrepreneurship: Entrepreneurial management. Strategic Management Journal, 11 (5), 17—27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-48543-8_7

Weerawardena J, Sullivan GM, Liesch PW, et al. (2007). Conceptualizing accelerated internationalization in the born global firm: A dynamic capabilities perspective. Journal of World Business, 42 (3), 294—306. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jwb.2007.04.004

Yamakawa Y, Peng MW, Deeds D L. (2008). What drives new ventures to internationalize from emerging to developed economies? Entrepreneurship Theory and Practice, 32 (1), 59—82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00216.x

Zahra S A, Ireland R D, Hitt M A. (2000). International expansion by new venture firms: International diversity, mode of market entry, technological learning, and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 43 (5), 925—950. http://dx.doi.org/doi: 10.2307/1556420

Downloads

Published

2016-10-20

Issue

Section

Articles