FDI and Export Linkage Revisited: The Case of Bangladesh

Authors

  • Muhammad Shariat Ullah Associate Professor Department of Management, University of Dhaka. Dhaka -1000.
  • Farida Yasmeen Junior Research Fellow & Research Assistant of Dr. Md. Abdul Mannan, President, Bangladesh Institute for Research (BIR), Dhaka -1216, Bangladesh

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.18533/jefs.v2i01.49

Keywords:

Bangladesh, Complements and substitutes, Export, Foreign direct investment.

Abstract

This empirical research examines the export effect of foreign direct investment (FDI) with reference to Bangladesh economy. An export supply function extended with the FDI variable has been employed with panel data. Econometric estimations unveil clear-cut contribution of inward FDI to boost export. Thus, this study ascertains that FDI and export are positively related to each other which mean trade and factor flows act as complements. Under such circumstance, higher growth of FDI will promote export growth.   

 

 

 

References

Anderson, J.E., 1979. A theoretical foundation for the gravity equation. The American Economic Review, 69(1):106-116.

Bangladesh Bank, 2010. Foreign direct investment in Bangladesh, Statistic Department, Survey Report: January-June 2010.

Bergstrand, J.H., 1985. The gravity equation in international trade: some microeconomic foundations and empirical evidence. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 67(3): 474-481. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1925976

Bergstrand, J.H., 1989. The generalized gravity equation, monopolistic competition and the factor proportion theory in international trade. The Review of Economics and Statistics, 71(1): 143-153.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1928061

Bergstrand, J.H., 1990. The Heckscher-Ohlin-Samuelson model, the Linder hypothesis and the determinants of bilateral intra-industry trade. Economic Journal, 100(403):1216-1229.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2233969

Deardorff, A.V., 1998. Determinants of bilateral trade: Does gravity work in a neoclassical world? In: J.A. Frankel (Ed.), The Regionalization of the World Economy, pp. 7-32. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.

Dunning, J. H., 1977. The determinants of international production. Oxford Economic Papers, 25(3): 289–330.

Feenstra, R.C., Markusen, J.A., Rose, A.K., 2001. Using the gravity equation to differentiate among alternative theories of trade. The Canadian Journal of Economics, 34(2): 430–447.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/0008-4085.00082

Helpman, E., 1987. Imperfect competition and international trade: evidence from fourteen industrial countries. Journal of Japanese and International Economics, 1(1):62-81.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0889-1583(87)90027-X

Helpman, E., Krugman P.R., 1985. Market structure and foreign trade: increasing return, imperfect competition and international economy. Cambridge: MIT Press.

Markusen, J.R., 1983. Multinationals, multi-plant economies, and the gains from trade. Journal of International Economics, 16(3-4): 205–226.http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0022-1996(84)80001-X

Mundell, R.A., 1957. International trade and factor mobility. The American Economic Review, 47(3):321-335.

Pain, N. and Katharine Wakelin, 1998. Export performance and the role of foreign direct investment. Manchester School of Economic and Social Studies, 66(3): 62-89.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9957.66.s.4

Pontes, J.P., 2005. FDI and trade: complements and substitutes. Technical University of Lisbon, Portugal.

Tinbergen, J., 1962. Shaping the world economy: Suggestions for an international economic policy. New York: Twentieth Century Fund.

Vernon, R., 1966. International investment and international trade in the product cycle. Quarterly Journal of Economics, 80(2): 190-207.http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1880689

Xuan, N.T. and Xing, Y., 2008. Foreign direct investment and exports: the experiences of Vietnam. Economics of Transition, 16(2): 183-197.http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0351.2008.00321.x

Downloads

Published

2014-02-25

Issue

Section

Articles