Directors characteristics and stock market performance in Canada
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.18533/jefs.v5i01.176Keywords:
Board of directors, Market performance, Toronto Stock Exchange.Abstract
We examine the effect of the characteristics of board of directors on the stock market performance in Canadian settings. Our sample includes fifty of the largest corporations listed on the Toronto Stock Exchange at the end of December 2013 for the period of 2009 to 2013 for the sub-groups of S&P/TSX Composite Index-60. Our results show that the size of the board, remuneration of directors and disclosure of financial information in terms of book value per share and earnings per share, contribute to market performance of firms in S&P/TSX Composite Index-60 listing.
References
Abbott L.J., Parker S., Peters G.F., 2004. Audit committee characteristics and restatements. Auditing: Journal of Practice & Theory, 19(2): 47-66. https://doi.org/10.2308/aud.2000.19.2.47
Adams R., & Mehran, H. (2003). Is Corporate Governance Different for Bank Holding Companies? Federal Reserve Bank of New York Economic Policy Review, Federal Reserve Bank of New York.
Afshan N., Chhetri P., Pradhan S., 2011. Board, Ownership Structure & Pay and Firm Performance: A Literature Review. The IUP Journal of Corporate Governance, X(2) :82-92.
Albouy M., 1993. La finance contre l'entreprise, Revue Française de Gestion, p. 29-38.
Al-Zwyalif I., M., 2013. IT Governance and its Impact on the Usefulness of Accounting Information Reported in Financial Statements. International Journal of Business and Social Science, 4(2):83-94.
Andreas J. M, Rapp MS, Wolff M., 2012. Determinants of director compensation in two-tier systems: evidence from German panel data., Revue of Management Sciences, 6:33–79. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11846-010-0048-z
Bao B., Chow L., 1999. The usefulness of earnings and book value for equity valuation in emerging capital market: evidence from listed companies in the People's Republic of China", Journal of International Financial Management and Accounting, 10: 85-104. https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-646X.00045
Barney JB., 1991. Firm Resources and Sustained Competitive Advantage. Journal of Management, 17: 99–120. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920639101700108
Barth M.E. (1991). Relative measurement errors among alternative pension asset and liability measures. The Accounting Review, 66:159-78.
Belkhir, M. 2009. Board of directors' size and performance in the banking Industry. International Journal of Managerial Finance. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 5(2):201-221. https://doi.org/10.1108/17439130910947903
Berthelot S., Francoeur C., Labelle R., 2012. Corporate governance mechanisms, accounting results and stock valuation in Canada. International Journal of Managerial Finance, 8 (4): 332-343. https://doi.org/10.1108/17439131211261251
Berthelot S., Morris T., Morrill C., 2010. Corporate governance rating and financial performance: a Canadian study. Corporate Governance, 10(5): 635-646. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701011085599
Brickley J., Linck, J., Coles J.,1999. What happens to CEOs after they retire? New evidence on career concerns, horizon problems, and incentives. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 52: 341-77. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0304-405x(99)00012-4
Chalmers K., Navissi F., Qu W., 2010. Value relevance of accounting information in China pre- and post-2001 accounting reforms. Managerial Auditing Journal, 25 (8): 792-813. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686901011069551
Charreaux G., Desbrières P., 1998. Gouvernance des entreprises : valeur partenariale contre valeur actionnariale. Finance-Contrôle-Stratégie, 1(2): 57-88.
Chatelin C. and Trébucq S.,2003. Stabilité et évolution du cadre conceptuel en gouvernance d'entreprise : un essai de synthèse. Communication pour les neuvièmes journées d'histoire de la comptabilité et du management, Jeudi 20 et Vendredi 21 mars 2003, Crefige - Université Paris-Dauphine, avec le Soutien de l'Association Francophone de Comptabilité
Chen G., Firth M., Gao, D.N., Rui, O.M., 2006. Ownership structure, corporate governance, and fraud: evidence from China. Journal of Corporate Finance, 12: 424-48. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2005.09.002
Coase, R. H. (1937) The Nature of the Firm. Economica, 4: 386–405. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0335.1937.tb00002.x
Conger J.A., Finegold, D., Lawler E., 1998. Appraising board performance. Harvard Business Review, January-February.
Dalton D.R., Daily C.M., Johnson J.L, Ellstrand, A.E., 1999. Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-Analysis. Academy of Management Journal, 42: 674-686. https://doi.org/10.2307/256988
De Almeida J.E.F., De Lima G.A.S.F., Lima I.S., 2009. Corporate governance and ADR effects on earnings quality in the Brazilian capital markets. Corporate Ownership and Control, 7(1).
Denglos G., 2007. Création de valeur et gouvernance de l'entreprise : Les exigences de l'actionnaire s'opposent-elles à l'intérêt « social » ? La Revue des Sciences de Gestion, 224-225:103-112. https://doi.org/10.3917/rsg.224.0103
DeZoort T., Hermanson, D.R., Archambeault D., Reed S., 2002. Audit committee effectiveness: a synthesis of the empirical audit committee literature. Journal of Accounting Literature, 21: 38-75.
Elsayed K., 2011. Board size and corporate performance: the missing role of board leadership structure. J Manag Gov, 15: 415–446. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-009-9110-0
Fama E.F., Jensen M., 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, 26: 301-326. https://doi.org/10.1086/467037
Fiador V.O., 2013. Corporate governance and value relevance of financial information: evidence from the Ghana Stock Exchange. Corporate Governance, 13(2): 208-217. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701311316689
Garcia L.S., Barbadillo E.R., Perez M.O., 2012. Audit committee and internal audit and the quality of earnings: empirical evidence from Spanish companies. J Manag Gov, 16:305–331. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-010-9152-3
Ghosh S., 2006. Do Board Characteristics Affect Corporate Performance: Firm-Level Evidence Forindia. Applied Economics Letter, 13(7): 435-43. https://doi.org/10.1080/13504850500398617
Greco G., 2011. Determinants of board and audit committee meeting frequency: evidence from Italian companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 26(3): 208-29. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686901111113172
Hahn P.D., Lasfer M., 2011. The compensation of non-executive directors: rationale, form, and findings. J. Manag. Gov., 15: 589–601. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-010-9134-5
Hasnah K., Hasnah H., 2009. Roles of board of directors: Evidence from Malaysian listed companies. Corporate Board: Role, Duties & Composition, 5(1): 22-36.
Hassan M.K., 2011. Corporate governance practices in emerging economies: initial findings from the UAE", China-USA. Business Review Journal, 10(9): 856-864.
Herman E., 1981. Corporate control, corporate power. Cambridge, MA: Cambridge University Press.
Hitt M.A., Ireland R.D., Hoskisson R.E., 2011. Strategic Management Competitiveness & Globalization: Concepts and Cases. Canada: South Western.
Ho C.A., Williams M., 2003. International Comparative Analysis of the Association Between Board Structure and the Efficiency of Value Added by a Firm from its Physical Capital and Intellectual Capital Resources». The International Journal of Accounting, 38(4): 465-491. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intacc.2003.09.001
Ivashkovskaya I. Stepanova A., 2011. Does strategic corporate performance depend on corporate financial architecture? Empirical study of European, Russian and other emerging market's firms. J. Manag. Gov., 15: 603–616. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10997-010-9132-7
Jensen M., 2001. Value Maximisation, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. European Financial Management, 7(3): 297-317. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-036X.00158
Jensen M.C., Zajac E.J., 2004. Corporate elites and corporate strategy: how demographic preferences and structural position shape the scope of the firm. Strategic Management Journal 25:507–524. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.393
Jensen M.C., Meckling W.H., 1976. Theory of the firm: Managerial behaviour, agency cost and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3: 305-360. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(76)90026-X
Kassim M., Aza A., Ishak Z., Abdul-Manaf N.A., 2013. Board effectiveness and company performance: assessing the mediating role of capital structure decisions. International Journal of Business and Society, 14(2): 319 – 338.
Kaymak T., Bektas E., 2008. East meets west? Board characteristics in an emerging market: Evidence from Turkish banks. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 16: 550–561. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2008.00713.x
Klein A., 2002. Audit committee, Board of Director Characteristics, and earnings management. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 33: 375-400. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(02)00059-9
Kothari S.P., 2001. Capital markets research in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31: 105-231. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00030-1
Kumar, M.B., 2000. Committee Report. On: www.sebi.gov.in.
Laksmana I., 2008. Corporate board governance and voluntary disclosure of executive compensation practices. Contemporary Accounting Research, 25(4): 1147-82. https://doi.org/10.1506/car.25.4.8
Lin D., Lin L. 2014. The interplay between director compensation and CEO compensation. The International Journal of Business and Finance Research, 8(2):11-26.
Lin J.W., Li J.F., Yang J.S., 2006. The effect of audit committee performance on earnings quality. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(9): 921–933. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900610705019
Linn S. C., Park D., 2005. Outside director compensation policy and the investment opportunity set. Journal of Corporate Finance, 11: 680–715. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2004.11.002
Lipton M., Lorsch J.W., 1992. A model proposal for improved corporate governance", Business Lawyer, 48(1): 59-77.
Maug E., 1997. Boards of directors and capital structure. Journal of Corporate Finance, 3: 113-39. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0929-1199(96)00010-7
Pearce J.A., Zahra S.A., 1992. Board composition from a strategic contingency perspective. Journal of Management Studies, 29: 411-438. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.1992.tb00672.x
Perry T., 2000. Incentive compensation for outside directors and CEO turnover. Working paper, Arizona State University, Tempe, AZ.
Pitelis C.N., 2004. Corporate Governance, Shareholder Value and Sustainable Economic Performance. Blackwell Publishing LtD, 12(2): 210-223. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-8683.2004.00362.x
Postma T., Van Ees H., Sterken E., 2003. Board composition and firm performance in the Netherlands. Research report, Research Institute SOM (Systems, Organizations, and Management), University of Groningen.
Prusty T. 2013. Corporate Governance through the EVA Tool: A Good Corporate Performance Driver. Journal of Asian Business Strategy, 3(12): 340-348
Rahman R.A., Ali, H.M., 2006. Board, audit committee, culture and earnings management: Malaysian evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, 21(7): 783–804. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686900610680549
Rehman A., Ali Shah S.Z., 2013. Board Independence, Ownership Structure and Firm Performance: Evidence from Pakistan. Interdisciplinary Journal of Contemporary Research in Business, 5(3):832-845.
Rodrigues J., Seabra M., 2012. An analysis of corporate board compensations in the Portuguese energy sector. Management of Environmental Quality: An International Journal, 23(1): 56-67. https://doi.org/10.1108/14777831211191593
Rouyer E., 2013. Company Performance and the Two-Tier Board Structure: Empirical Evidence from France. International Journal of Business and Economics, 12(1): 45-58.
Shamsul N.A., 2004. Board Composition, CEO Duality and Performances Among Malaysian Listed Companies. Corporate Governance, 4(4): 47-61. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720700410558871
Sharma V., Naicker V., Lee, B., 2009. Determinants of audit committee meeting frequency: evidence from a voluntary governance system. Accounting Horizons, 23(3): 245-64. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.2009.23.3.245
Shelvin T., 1991. The valuation of R&D firms with R&D limited partnerships. The Accounting Review, 66: 1-22.
Shiah-Hou S.-R., Cheng C.-W., 2012. Outside director experience, compensation, and performance. Managerial Finance, 38(10): 914-938. https://doi.org/10.1108/03074351211255146
Steiner I.D., 1972. Group process and productivity. New York: Academic Press.
Vafeas N., 1999. Board meeting frequency and firm performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 53: 113-42. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(99)00018-5
Van G.H., 2009. International Financial Reporting Standards: A Practical Guide. World Bank Publications, Washington, DC.
Varma V.S., Patel A., 2012. The Impact of audit committee appointment and reporting arrangements on audit committees' Independence. Journal of Commerce & Accounting Research 1(3):51-59 .
Wang Y.-C., Tsai J.-J., Lin H.-W. W., 2013. The Influence of Board Structure on Firm Performance. The Journal of Global Business Management, 9(2):1-14.
Weschler D. (1989). Giving the Watchdog Fangs. Forbes, November, pp. 103 - 133.
Wirtz P., 2006. Compétences, conflits et création de valeur: vers une approche intégrée de la gouvernance. Revue finance et contrôle de stratégie, 9(2): 187-201.
Yermack D., 1996. Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors. Journal of Financial Economics, 40: 185–212. https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(95)00844-5
Yin F., Gao S., Li W., Lv H., 2012. Determinants of audit committee meeting frequency: evidence from Chinese listed companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, 27(4): 425-444. https://doi.org/10.1108/02686901211218003
Zahra S.A., Pearce J.A., 1989. Boards of directors and corporate financial performance: a review and integrative model. Journal of Management, 15(2): 291-334. https://doi.org/10.1177/014920638901500208
Zhang L. 2012. Board demographic diversity, independence, and corporate social performance. Corporate Governance Journal, 12(5): 686-700. https://doi.org/10.1108/14720701211275604
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after official publication, as it can lead to productive exchanges as well as greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).