Bilateral trade agreements and the rise of global supply chains


  • Zdzisław W. Puślecki Adam Mickiewicz University, Poznań Faculty of Political Science and Journalism ul. Umultowska 89A 61-614 Poznań, Poland



Bilateral trade policy, Foreign trade, Global supply chains, Multilateral trade negotiations.


This paper investigates the influence of the rise global supply chains on bilateral trade agreements. Given that a few multinational firms are responsible for a major share of world trade, our findings suggest that these firms may support regulatory harmonization across different Preferential Trade Agreements (PTAs) to lower trade costs or resist harmonization – and encourage certain non-tariff measures – to prevent new competitors from entering markets. The finding partly explains the persistence of regulatory divergence.  Building on institutional and comparative trade hypothesis, the findings of the paper present new tendencies in the foreign trade policy: the impact of the rise global supply chains on the political economy of trade, motivations for countries in cooperating on trade policies, and the increasing importance of bilateral agreements in the foreign trade policy. Additionally, the findings suggest that the political economy of regulatory convergence may be more complex than is sometimes suggested in the prior literature. 


Antràs, P.&Staiger, R.W. (2012). Trade agreements and the nature of price determination, American Economic Review Papers and Proceedings 102 (3), 470-476.

Bagwell K.,& Staiger, R.W. (1999).Domestic policies, national sovereignty and international economic institutions, NBER Working Papers, 7293. National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.Baldwin, R. (2012). WTO 2.0. Global governance of supply chain trade, Policy Insight, 64. Centre for Economic Policy Research.

Ciuriak D., B. Lapham, &Wolfe, R. with Collins-Williams, T. & Curtis, J.M. (2011). Firms in International Trade: Towards a New Trade Policy.

Deudney D. (2014). Hegemony, nuclear weapons, and liberal hegemony, In G. J. Ikenberry (Ed.), Power, order, and change in world politics, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press.

Eagleton-Pierce, M. (2013). Symbolic power in the World Trade Organization, Oxford. Oxford University Press.

Jackson R. J. (2013). Global politics in the 21st century, New York, Cambridge University Press.

Jones, K. (2015). Reconstructing the World Trade Organization for 21st century, an institutional approach, Oxford, New York, Oxford University Press.

Jupill, W.M. & Snidal, D. (2013). Institutional choice and global commerce, New York, Cambridge University Press.

Kirshner, O. (2013). American trade politics and the triumph of globalism, New York &London, Routledge Taylore & Francis Group.

Krasner, S. D. (1976). State power and the structure of international trade. World Politics 28, 317-347.

Krist, W. (2013). Globalization and America’s trade agreements, Baltimore, John Hopkins UniversityPress.

Krugman, P. (1991). Increasing returns and economic geography, Massachusetts Institute of Technology.

Kupchan, Ch. A. (2014). Unpacking hegemony: the social foundations of hierarchical order, In: G. J. Ikenberry (Ed.), Power, order, and change in world politics, Cambridge, Cambridge UniversityPress.

Mattoo A. & Olarreaga M. (2001). Should credit be given for autonomous liberalization in multilateral trade negotiation, CEPR Discussion Papers 2821.

Prusa, T.J. & Teh, R. (2010). Protection reduction and diversion: PTAs and the incidence of antidumping disputes”, NBER Working Papers 16276, National Bureau of Economic Research, Inc.

WTO, (2011) The2011WorldTrade Report.