Risk weighted alpha index – analysis of the ASX50 index

Nipun Agarwal

Abstract


Major stock indexes are developed on the market capitalization or price weighted indexation method. The Australian Stock Exchange 50 (ASX50) index is a market capitalization index of the top 50 Australian stocks. Fundamental indexation, equal weighted index and risk weighted index methods have recently been developed as an alternative to the market cap and price indexes. However, empirical studies do not conclusively prove if these alternate methods are more efficient to the existing market cap or price weighted methods. Also, the fundamental index method provides a higher alpha, while the risk weighted index methods focus on risk reduction through diversification. There is a gap to develop another passive indexation method in order to provide the investor a higher return (alpha) and lower volatility. This paper re-weights the ASX50 index using the risk weighted alpha method and provides higher weight to stocks that have increasing returns and lower volatility. The empirical study for ASX50 index from 2002-2012 is undertaken and results show that the risk weighted alpha method provides higher return and has lower systematic risk than the ASX50 index.


Keywords


Equity index models; Risk weighted alpha; Investment management; Portfolio construction.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amenc N., Goltz F., Martellini L., Retkowsky L., 2010. Efficient Indexation: An Alternative to Cap-Weighted Indices. EDHEC-Risk Institute.

Basu A.K., Forbes B., 2013. Does fundamental indexation lead to better risk-adjusted returns? New evidence from Australian Securities Exchange. Accounting & Finance, 53(3).

Benartzi S., Thaler R.H. 2001.Naive Diversification Strategies in Defined Contribution Saving Plans. American Economic Review, 91(1):79-98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.1.79

Blitz D., Swinkels L., 2008. Fundamental indexation: An active value strategy in disguise. Journal of Asset Management, 9:264-269. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/jam.2008.23

Blitz D., Bart van der G., van Vliet P. 2010. Fundamental Indexation: Rebalancing Assumptions and Performance. The Journal of Index Investing, 1(2):82-88. http://dx.doi.org/10.3905/jii.2010.1.2.082

Chia C.P., Melas D., Zhou T., 2011. Turbulent Times Ahead: Does Risk-Based Strategy Diversification Work? Journal of Indexes Europe.

Chow T., Hsu J.C., Kalesnik V., Little B., 2011. A Survey of Alternative Equity Index Strategies. Financial Analysts Journal, vol. 67(5):37-57. http://dx.doi.org/10.2469/faj.v67.n5.5

Choueifaty Y., Coignard Y., 2008. Toward Maximum Diversification. Journal of Portfolio Management, 35(1):40–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.3905/JPM.2008.35.1.40

Clarke R.G., de Silva H., Thorley S., 2006. Minimum-Variance Portfolios in the U.S. Equity Market. Journal of Portfolio Management, 33(1):10–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.3905/jpm.2006.661366

Demey P., Maillard S., Roncalli T., 2010. Risk-based Indexation. Working paper, Lyxor Asset Management.

DeMiguel V., Garlappi L. and Uppal R. 2009., Optimal Versus Naive Diversification: How Inefficient is the 1/N Portfolio Strategy? Review of Financial Studies, 22:1915-1953. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhm075

Fernholz R., 1995. Portfolio Generating Functions. Working paper, INTECH.

Fernholz R., Garvy R., Hannon J., 1998. Diversity-Weighted Indexing. Journal of Portfolio Management, 24(2):74–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.3905/jpm.24.2.74

Haugen R.A., Baker N.L. 1991. The Efficient Market Inefficiency of Capitalization-Weighted Stock Portfolios. Journal of Portfolio Management, 17(3):35–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.3905/jpm.1991.409335

Hsu J.C., 2006. Cap-Weighted Portfolios Are Sub-Optimal Portfolios. Journal of Investment Management, 4(3):1–10.

Hsu J.C., Kalesnik V., Surti H., 2010. An Examination of Traditional Style Indices. Journal of Index Investing, 1(2):14–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.3905/jii.2010.1.2.014

Hsu J.C., Kalesnik V., Xie S. 2011. What Makes Fundamental Index Methodology Work? Working paper, Research Affiliates.

Kaplan P.D. 2008. Why Fundamental Indexation Might—or Might Not—Work. Financial Analysts Journal. 64(1):32-39. http://dx.doi.org/10.2469/faj.v64.n1.5

Lowry V.T., 2007. Fundamentally Better. Journal of Indexes, (March/April):24-31. Mar J., Bird R., Casavecchia L. and Yeung D. Fundamental Indexation: An Australian Investigation. Australian Journal of Management. 34(1):1-20.

Markowitz H., 1952. Portfolio Selection. Journal of Finance, 7(1):77–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1952.tb01525.x

Markowitz H., 1959. Portfolio Selection: Efficient Diversification of Investments. Cowles Foundation Monograph No. 16. New York: John Wiley &Sons, Inc.

Perold A.F., 2007. Fundamentally Flawed Indexing. Financial Analysts Journal, 63(6):31-37. http://dx.doi.org/10.2469/faj.v63.n6.4924

Robert A.D., Hsu J.C., 2008. Noise, CAPM and the Size and Value Effects. Journal of Investment Management, 6(1):1–11.

Robert A.D., Kalesnik V., Moghtader P., Scholl C., 2010. Beyond Cap Weight: The Empirical Evidence fora Diversified Beta. Journal of Indexes, 13(1):16–29.

Seigel J.J., 2006. The 'Noisy Market' Hypothesis. The Wall Street Journal (June 14): A14.

Sharpe W.F., 1964. Capital Asset Prices: A Theory of Market Equilibrium under Conditions of Risk. Journal of Finance, 19(3):425–442. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1964.tb02865.x

Waid R.J., 2007. Fundamentally Active. Working paper, Wilshire Associates.

Windcliff H., Boyle P., 2004. The 1/n Pension Plan Puzzle. North American Actuarial Journal, 8:32-45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10920277.2004.10596151




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.18533/jefs.v1i01.34

Article Metrics

Metrics Loading ...

Metrics powered by PLOS ALM

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.
';



Copyright (c) 2014 Nipun Agarwal

.............................................................................................................................

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.

.............................................................................................................................

If you find difficulties in submitting manuscript please forward your doc file to support@journalofeconomics.org. Our support team will assist you in submission process and other technical matters. Please note that documents uploaded by yourself are reviewed more quickly than replies by e-mail.

In order to get notifications on inbox please add  this domain journalofeconomics.org in your email safe list.

.............................................................

ISSN 2379-9463(Print)
ISSN 2379-9471(Online)

...........................................................