An Empirical Analysis on Credit Risk Models and its Application
Keywords:Collateral management, Expected default frequency, KMV.
AbstractThis study intends to focus on introducing credit default risk with widely used credit risk models in an effort to empirically test whether the models hold their validity, apply to financial institutions which usually are highly levered with various types of debts, and finally reinterpret the results in computing adequate collateral level in the over-the-counter derivatives market. By calculating the distance-to-default values using historical market data for South Korean banks and brokerage firms as suggested in Merton model and KMV’s EDF model, we find that the performance of the introduced models well reflect the credit quality of the sampled financial institutions. Moreover, we suggest that in addition to the given credit ratings of different financial institutions, their distance-to-default values can be utilized in determining the sufficient level of credit support. Our suggested “smoothened” collateral level allows both contractual parties to minimize their costs caused from provision of collateral without undertaking additional credit risk and achieve efficient collateral management.
Bharath, S., Shumway, T., 2004. Forecasting default with the KMV-Merton model, AFA 2006 Boston Meetings Paper, University of Michigan.
Black, F., Scholes, M., 1973. The pricing of options and corporate liabilities. The Journal of Political Economy, 81: 637-659. http://dx.doi.org/10.1086/260062
Caouette, J., Altman, E., Narayanan, P., Nimmo, R., 2008. Managing credit risk: The great challenge for the global financial markets, John Wiley & Sons. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9781118266236
Chan-Lau, J., Jobert, A., Kong, J., 2004. An 0ption-based approach to bank vulnerabilities in emerging markets, Epub No. 04-33. International Monetary Fund.
Crosbie, P., Bohn, J., 2003. Modeling default risk, Research Paper, Moody's KMV.
Hull, J., 2002. Options, futures, and other derivatives, Prentice Hall.
Hull, J., Predescu, M., White, A., 2004. The relationship between credit default swap spreads, bond yields and credit rating announcements, Journal of Banking and Finance, 28(11), 2789-2811. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jbankfin.2004.06.010
Jo, H., 2003. Credit Risk: Measurement and management, Segyeong.
Merton, R., 1974. On the pricing of corporate debt: the risk structure of interest rates, Journal of Finance, 29(2), 449-470. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.1974.tb03058.x, http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2978814
Munves, D., Smith, A., Hamilton, D., 2010. Banks and their EDF measures now and through the credit crisis: too high, too low, or just about right?, Research Paper, Moody's Analytics.
Vassalou, M., Xing, Y., 2004. Default risk in equity returns, Journal of Finance, 59(2), 831-868. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2004.00650.x
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Authors retain copyright and grant the journal right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgement of the work's authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal's published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgement of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) after official publication, as it can lead to productive exchanges as well as greater citation of published work (See The Effect of Open Access).